Document Comparison

PCI_Card_Production_Logical_AOC_V1.pdf PCI_Card_Production_Logical_AOC_v3_2024.pdf
87% similar
8 → 9 Pages
1437 → 1492 Words
22 Content Changes

Content Changes

22 content changes. 7 administrative changes (dates, page numbers) hidden.

Added p. 4
• Was the review done onsite or remotely:

• If remotely, state the rationale:

• Reason why sub-requirement(s) were not applicable.

Non-Compliant due to Legal exception: One or more requirements are marked non-compliant as “Open” or “New” due to a legal restriction that prevents the requirement from being met. This option requires additional review from the payment brand.

Note: Contractual obligations or legal advice are not legal restrictions. If checked, complete the following:
Modified p. 3
Type of Assessment Annual Existing Vendor that added services Initial (New Vendor) Card Production Activities Assessed:
Type of Assessment Annual audit

• no change in activities
Existing location that added activities Initial (new facility) Card Production Activities Assessed:
Modified p. 3
Card (Mobile) Provisioning Activities Assessed:
Mobile Provisioning Activities Assessed:
Modified p. 3
Secure Element Provisioning Services Product/Solution Description Cloud-based (HCE) Provisioning Services Product/Solution Description Part 2c. Locations
Secure Element Provisioning Activities Product/Solution Description Cloud-based (HCE) Provisioning Activities Product/Solution Description
Modified p. 3 → 4
Identify date(s) spent onsite at the entity:
If applicable, identify date(s) spent onsite at the entity:
Modified p. 4 → 5
 Full

• The requirement and all sub-requirements of that requirement were assessed, and no sub-requirements were marked as “Not Applicable” in the ROC.
• The requirement and all sub-requirements of that requirement were assessed, and no sub- requirements were marked as “Not Applicable” in the ROC.
Modified p. 4 → 5
 Partial

• One or more sub-requirements of that requirement were marked as “Not Applicable” in the ROC.
• One or more sub-requirements of that requirement were marked as “Not Applicable” in the ROC.
Modified p. 4 → 5
 None

• All sub-requirements of that requirement were marked as “Not Applicable” in the ROC.
• All sub-requirements of that requirement were marked as “Not Applicable” in the ROC.
Modified p. 4 → 5
Details of specific sub-requirements that were marked as “Not Applicable” in the ROC  Reason why sub-requirement(s) were not applicable
Details of specific sub-requirements that were marked as “Not Applicable” in the ROC
Modified p. 4 → 5
Section 2: Roles and Responsibilities
Section 1: Roles and Responsibilities
Modified p. 4 → 5
Section 3: Security Policy and Procedures
Section 2: Security Policy and Procedures
Modified p. 4 → 5
Section 4: Data Security
Section 3: Data Security
Modified p. 4 → 5
Section 5: Network Security
Section 4: Network Security
Modified p. 4 → 5
Section 6: System Security
Section 5: System Security
Modified p. 4 → 5
Section 7: User Management and System Access Control
Section 6: User Management and System Access Control
Modified p. 4 → 5
Section 8: Key Management: Secret Data
Section 7: Key Management: Secret Data
Modified p. 4 → 5
Section 9: Key Management: Confidential Data
Section 8: Key Management: Confidential Data
Modified p. 4 → 5
Section 10: PIN Distribution via Electronic Methods
Section 9: PIN Distribution via Electronic Methods
Removed p. 6
Compliant but with Legal exception: One or more requirements are marked “Not in Place” due to a legal restriction that prevents the requirement from being met. This option requires additional review from acquirer or payment brand.
Modified p. 6 → 7
Compliant: All sections of the PCI Card Production and Provisioning Logical Security ROC are complete, all questions answered affirmatively, resulting in an overall COMPLIANT rating; thereby (Card Prodcution and Provisioning Vendoir Company Name) has demonstrated full compliance with the PCI Card Production and Provisioning Logical Security Requirements.
Compliant: All sections of the PCI Card Production and Provisioning Logical Security ROC are complete, all questions answered affirmatively, resulting in an overall COMPLIANT rating; thereby (Card Production and Provisioning Vendor Company Name) has demonstrated full compliance with the PCI Card Production and Provisioning Logical Security Requirements.
Modified p. 6 → 7
Non-Compliant: Not all sections of the PCI Card Production and Provisioning Logical Security ROC are complete, or not all questions are answered affirmatively, resulting in an overall NON-COMPLIANT rating, thereby (Card Prodcution and Provisioning Vendor Company Name) has not demonstrated full compliance with the PCI Card Production and Provisioning Logical Security Requirements.
Non-Compliant: Not all sections of the PCI Card Production and Provisioning Logical Security ROC are complete, or not all questions are answered affirmatively, resulting in an overall NON-COMPLIANT rating, thereby (Card Production and Provisioning Vendor Company Name) has not demonstrated full compliance with the PCI Card Production and Provisioning Logical Security Requirements.
Modified p. 8 → 9
PCI Card Production Logical Section Description of Requirement Compliant to PCI Card Vendor Security Requirements (Select One) Remediation Date and Actions (If “NO” selected for any Requirement) 2 Roles and Responsibilities 3 Security Policy and Procedures 4 Data Security 5 Network Security 6 System Security 7 User Management and System Access Control 8 Key Management: Secret Data 9 Key Management: Confidential Data 10 Electronic PIN Distribution
PCI Card Production and Provisioning Logical Section Description of Requirement Compliant to PCI Card Vendor Security Requirements (Select One) Remediation Date and Actions (If “NO” selected for any Requirement) 1 Roles and Responsibilities 2 Security Policy and Procedures 3 Data Security 4 Network Security 5 System Security 6 User Management and System Access Control 7 Key Management: Secret Data 8 Key Management: Confidential Data 9 PIN Distribution via Electronic Methods